Ric Flair/Hall of Fame

[Kyle Heaven]

ravenbomb said:

While I disagree with it 100%, I could understand someone thinking 2010 was better than 2001: A Space Odyssey.

all i see are lies

[John Gone]

Once Upon a Time in Mexico was better than El Mariachi.

[Kyle Heaven]

"godzilla vs mecha godzilla" was a better movie than "godzilla"



...



yeah i cant say that with a straight face

[Anthony Jordan]

If you like plot and backstory, Kill Bill Volume 2 was superior to the first, though it was hard to resist the spontaneous violence of the first.

[John Gone]

heaven said:

ravenbomb said:

While I disagree with it 100%, I could understand someone thinking 2010 was better than 2001: A Space Odyssey.

all i see are lies

Once again, I disagree with it. 2001: A Spacye Odyssey is hands down the better film. But that's NOT to say that 2010 isn't a well put together movie as well. The acting is good all around (Hellen Mirren makes a cute lil' Commie, too), and the story is good. The difference is that the complaints of pretension people levied at 2001 cannot be made of 2010. It's a straightforward movie, and I can understand someone preferring that to 2001's artsy stuff.

[Kyle Heaven]

anthonyjordan said:

If you like plot and backstory, Kill Bill Volume 2 was superior to the first, though it was hard to resist the spontaneous violence of the first.

sadly, i was dissapointed in kill bill


ive seen so many asian sword flicks (some good, some bad, some downright awful), that kill bill volume 1 i didn't even find espcially violent

[Wife Beater]

anthonyjordan said:

If you like plot and backstory, Kill Bill Volume 2 was superior to the first, though it was hard to resist the spontaneous violence of the first.

Wasn't a sequel though.

It was intended to be all one film.

[Kyle Heaven]

ravenbomb said:

heaven said:

all i see are lies

Once again, I disagree with it. 2001: A Spacye Odyssey is hands down the better film. But that's NOT to say that 2010 isn't a well put together movie as well. The acting is good all around (Hellen Mirren makes a cute lil' Commie, too), and the story is good. The difference is that the complaints of pretension people levied at 2001 cannot be made of 2010. It's a straightforward movie, and I can understand someone preferring that to 2001's artsy stuff.

if you can't appretiate "artsy stuff", i fail to understand why you would go to a kubrick film at all


hell, a movie called "2001: a space oddessy" should tip you off that this is a bit cleverer than your average space junk flick

[morningstar]

David Slam is in the fucking HOF?

[Assassin]

I liked it when Godzilla would FLY.

[Kyle Heaven]

kill bill would have been much better as a four hour film




four hours of sword fighting? i'm there!

[Anthony Jordan]

Quite a few movies intend to have sequels that make it one story, but they are still considered sequels. That's how I based my judgment.

[Jake Seven]

wifebeater said:

anthonyjordan said:

If you like plot and backstory, Kill Bill Volume 2 was superior to the first, though it was hard to resist the spontaneous violence of the first.

Wasn't a sequel though.

It was intended to be all one film.

As was Star Wars and Lord of The Rings....

I consider anything with the same storyline, or idea (preferably with the same title or concept), continued in another movie to be a sequel.

Also to note....The Dark Knight WILL be added to this list.


EDIT to note: Queen Of The Damned, is NOT a sequel to Interview With A Vampire.

[Kyle Heaven]

morningstar said:

David Slam is in the fucking HOF?

on an ooc basis, yes



i dont understand it either, he must have embarassing pics of timmy or something

[Kyle Heaven]

god, the first batman movie fell apart in the last half hour